Employment Growth and Equality Samples for Studetns-Myassignment

Question: Discuss about the Advocacy of Employer association in regards to Penalty Rates and their Implications in reduction of Penalty Rates for Employment Growth and Equality. Answer: Introduction Industrial success depends on strong positive mutual understanding between management and employees regarding collective bargaining by trade union. The dynamic domain of enterprise industrial relations incorporates various union and industrial relations concepts that can enhance worker employer relationships (Ferner, 2012). Before 19th century workers in Australia did not have legal term to fight against their rights in company regarding negotiation in wages increment, rights of decision power, working hours and regarding other disputes. Industrial workers of Melbourne, Australia have marked the history by introducing the system of working 8 hours a day in any industry. Trade Union Act later was commenced in 19th century (Gold Rush), legally by legislative to fights and negotiating for workers wages and working condition in industry with the higher management. The scope of this essay analyses employer association in connection to reduction of penalty rates as listed in Modern Awards. The Fair Work Commission proceeding for Penalty Rate case for employer association and their advocacies as well as their implications in reduction for employment growth and income equality is examined. This analysis is an important aspect of ways and means to manage people at work place and will help analyse the potential impacts in industrial systems. Penalty and Modern Reward The scope of introduction of Trade Union laws and other prominent aspects and systems within the industrial domain was to bring a standard for uniformity. Powerful trade unions had in mind that they need to reduce penalty rates and induce in a system that can commensurate wages paid to workers. Primary motive behind the introduction of law of trade union in Australia was to change the trend of low wages for all jobs and comparatively high working hours. They too wanted to bring in the system for workers to favor for overtime credit in terms of money(Mowbray, 2015). Trade union helped all standard workers to increment in wage rate along with fixed working hours as per Hawkes Accord (1970-80). As per Creighton report this law faced multi-complexity 1950. Australian companies generally make legal Enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA) between workers and management to avoid future disputes. As per Fair Work Act 2009, the fair commission at every four years interval conducts review in 3 s teps, dealing, issue and award stage. Later it had stated that Penalty should be dealt by separate legislative (17, March 2014) rather than as common issue(Barry, 2015). Jurisdiction submitted its final hearing of all cases 2015-2016 done on basis of evidences and submission of survey reports by eyewitnesses related to weekend and public holiday penalty and other issues in modern awards such as Restaurant Industry Award 2010, General Retail Award 2010 and so on. Thus, there was an option that was created to attend to penalty rates and create uniformity amongst workers. General public was given open invitation to participate in such cases to fight against or in favor of industry and workers penalty matter. The justice during hearing agreed to arguments in favor of workers regarding non penalty of wages for halting work during public holidays and others(Drahokoupil, 2014). This will affect the motivational part of employees toward their work. So full on Justice finally consider the of fer of awarding employees with extra overtime pay during extra effort and time put in for organisation during weekends and public holidays(Knox, 2009). From 1950 there has been much complexity for bargaining by Trade union for workers rights, due to high demanding from them. Employee Association and United voice was collecting cases with evidences to put before justice to assure during hearing that the modern award built is not favorable in working condition, but it has been finally denied by full on justice (Section 156). Court did not passes the proposal kept in front of justice by the Trade union to take some tests to confirm that the modern award does not fulfills modern awards Objectives as it takes to consider sec 156 which is not commission lookout to overcome circumstances(Craig, 2015). AI group from their point of view kept a proposal in court that has been taken for consideration that, we can extend the modern award it will be beneficial to fulfill its objective in a material form. The primary notion was to generate an effect for the workers at the industrial level who are paid daily wages systems. Additional remuneration should be appreciated to workers as per section 134(1) who performs their works with extra effort during weekends and public holidays. It has been passing taking into consideration that work done at this time, should be beneficial to the organisation and secondly it should be given extra remuneration at higher rate than that of daily fix during agreement(Ibrahim, 2016). Justice does not pass law in acceptance of extra work done during Saturday for few sectors, but sectors like Fast food, Retail, Pharmacy employees (Section 65 66) should be given extra pay for the time allotted to company during weekends to benefit them. Extra pay for the workers of fast food should increase and decrease as per their standard of work by the owner. Pubs and restaurant employees should be awarded to fulfill modern award objective during festive seasons late nights and extra duty hours(Wilkinson, 2010). Full on justice disagree to the proposal regarding Sunday overtime extra remuneration by stating justice that, maximum workers takes money of overtime on Sunday where there is less pressure for work compare to that of weekdays and Saturdays(Boxall, 2016). Full on justice finally decided to decrease the penalty rates in Hospitality and Retail rewards due to reasons discusses above in contest from 250 to 225 in case of full time and pass time and in casual 275 to 250. Full on justice particularly marked the reason of rate cut in pay due disutility hours spend in working on Sundays and other holidays. Saturday to be taken as general Working day and other changes were made for this(Fan, 2016). Common evidences collected from different groups and common people regarding penalty rates for working on Sundays and public holidays(Cooper, 2008). Productivity Commission Inquiry Report pinpointing specially for workplace relations framework also known as PC report, has differ totally to that of Full Benchs conclusion though it would have taken available with them reports as evidences like Rose and Sand report to that of employers and employees report which clearly shows and proves that reports submitted in any case is justifies for penalties to be levied for Sundays and Saturdays(Healy, 2016). Whereas on other side, Retail and hospitality management report states that, reduction in labor cost during weekends and other holidays is acceptable due to reduction in staff, lowering working hours and so on. Reduction in penalty rates can be seen as a positive initiative that can impact on productivity in employees. This can also promote income equality amongst employees leading to better performance and employee level satisfaction. Penalty rates should be reduced and more changes should be brought into being for effective and efficie nt management of workers unions and to avoid conflicts. The goal behind reduction and penalty rates was to create and generate a parity in income levels such that workers can benefit from them. Reasons and Conclusion Full on Justice after considering all the reports and evidences submitted by many groups to make changes in penalty rates for working on Sundays and other public holidays particularly favorable on Hospitability and Retail Awards. Full on Justice agreed to increase and decrease penalty rates on the basis of report submitted by PC as default approach for casual employees. As mentioned above casual employees should be awarded with 25 percentage extra money to that of full time and part time employees. These two industries Hospitality and retail differ in many ways in characteristics to that of other. Job openings for public are higher in sector like Hospitality, Entertainment, Retail, restaurants and cafes (HERRC). Workers of these companies tend to require working more on weekends and on holidays as it is opened for public entertainment more and extra profitable for companies. Chief justice showed extra concern and agreed to increase extra pay for those employees who work and earn day to day wages to earn bread for family. No extra pay been awarded to save money for future life. Therefore based on evidence report submitted by SDA and united voice to impose pay penalty for extra worked done on Sundays and public holiday days taking an individual point of view. Ordered by justice to straight away to rewarding workers of this level to give them bit relief from tough time. Workers who take away extra load of work home to mark as Sunday overtime to get overtime, was totally disagreed by judge. Finally it has been decided and finalized by Full on justice on based of all evidences that penalty changes on Sunday holidays will be in effect from 1 July 2017 and late night rewards reduction and increment started from March 2017. References Barry, M. 2015. Employer and employer association matters in Australia in 2015. . Journal of Industrial Relations, 0022185616634092. Boxall, P. a. 2016. Strategy and Human Resource Management, Third Edition. In Chapter 1 The Goals of Human Resource Management (pp. 1-33). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Cooper, R. . 2008. The neoliberal state, trade unions and collective bargaining in Australia. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 532-554. Craig, L. . 2015. Nonstandard employment and nonwork activities, time alone and with others: Can weekend workers make up lost time?. . Journal of Industrial Relations, 3-23. Drahokoupil, J. 2014. Decision-making in multinational corporations: key issues in international business strategy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 199-215. Fan, D. X. 2016. The paths of managing international human resources of emerging market multinationals: Reconciling strategic goal and control means. Human Resource Management Review, 298-310. Ferner, A. E. 2012. Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations, 163-187. Healy, J. 2016. The Australian labour market in 2015. . Journal of Industrial Relations, 308-323. Ibrahim, H. I. 2016. An empirical inquiry into the relationship between corporate governance and human resource management. Knox, A. 2009. Better the devil you know? An analysis of employers' bargaining preferences in the Australian hotel industry. Journal of Industrial Relations, 25-44. Mowbray, P. K. 2015. An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 382-400. Wilkinson, A. G. 2010. Conceptualizing employee participation in organizations.